1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 24, 2019 9:37:10 GMT
David's run ends 11th May from what I know and he doesn't have an alternate. He's well worth seeing, I saw him twice and his Final Lair scene blew me away! Couldn't agree more. The Final Lair scene reduced me to tears, a feat other Phantom has achieved (and I've seen a few!).
There were little touches in that final scene that were, for me reminscent of Jack Nicholson as The Joker
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 23, 2019 14:05:28 GMT
I do wonder if eventually Phantom will have a compete overhaul. Given all the recent chit chat re Les Mis original not being iconic enough to keep going according to Cam Mac. I don't think it would ever change to the touring version as it just simply isn't as good as the Les Mis version so is no contest for the original. Surely they should do SOMETHING just to update it a bit though. It needs it IMO. Perhaps they'll only wait until after Hal Prince carks?!
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 23, 2019 14:02:32 GMT
Does anyone know if David Thaxton a) does all performances? b) has any holiday coming up? No massive desire to see Phantom again but would like to just for Thaxton - loved him in Les Mis and JCS! Thaxters was absolutely SUPERB - highly, highly recommended. He has it all!
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 23, 2019 14:01:41 GMT
And what about those fireballs that the Phantom chucks at Raoul in the graveyard fight 😂 Paul Daniels has much to answer for!
Although the bit with the flames at the end of the Masquerade scene is enough to singe yer eyebrows if you're in the first few rows like we were!!!!!
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 23, 2019 14:00:25 GMT
Thanks for all the seat advice everyone! Much appreciated. I'll try and forget the spoilers before I see it in a few weeks So I saw the show the other day - sat in stalls O4 as advised, and had a perfect view! I very rarely sit in the stalls but I'm glad I did. Loved the show - the costumes and sets were stunning. The overture and the scene where they go in the boat was incredible, really spine-tingling stuff for someone who hasn't seen it before! One question though; what was with the random robot doll thing of Christine(?) that the Phantom had in his lair at one point? Obviously showing his lust for her, but there was no reference to it that I can recall (may be wrong, not being very familiar with the show) and it just seemed a bit random and made him seem more predatory when I got the impression the story was ultimately trying to elicit sympathy for him.
Funnily enough, I went recently with 2 first timers (and only semi-regular theatre-goers) and the doll/automaton confused them too.
Another thought the body that was hung was Carlotta! I must admit when actually having to explain it as Buquet, it comes across as rather lame and inconsequential! (doing away with a barely featured character who's probably not registered with most of the audience)
One friend also speculated about how The Phantom could have posssibly learned all these skills living separated from society with no access to schooling, mentoring etc...
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 19, 2019 11:07:09 GMT
Unfortunately the show needed mic'ing at the Union. Couldn't hear any of the lyrics over the music.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 18, 2019 20:41:04 GMT
I always hoped that Elaine Paige would record Friendly Fire - how fabulous would that be!?!?
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 18, 2019 9:20:06 GMT
Fantastic news - let's hope does some London dates. Wonder which PSB songs the two existing ones are.... I would hope one is the amazing "Friendly Fires"
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Cash
Apr 17, 2019 16:19:30 GMT
Post by distantcousin on Apr 17, 2019 16:19:30 GMT
I would not pay by card for anything less than £5 - utterly ridiculous. Fully agree, a real annoyance when someone pulls out a card to pay for a couple of small items but contactless payments have made this quicker. I also got fed up with having bank statements longer than my arm because of every last transaction. Couldn't see the wood for the trees.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Cash
Apr 16, 2019 22:02:47 GMT
Post by distantcousin on Apr 16, 2019 22:02:47 GMT
Oh, I'd say roughly the same number as those who have touched the card machine keypad before it's your turn.🤮🤮 When you are out and about in public do you wear disposable gloves and carry disinfectant with you, while wearing a surgical mask, to avoid all the germs, dirt, skin flakes, mites, snot, phlegm, urine and other bodily fluids that exist on every single object and surface you come into contact with and inhale with every breath?! I always wear gloves when I'm out and about. When I get money out of a cash point I use an old receipt or some other bit of paper so I don't have to touch the keypad or touchscreen. Contactless is great - as are automatic taps! All the supermarkets installing self checkouts is nightmare as they won't work unless you have bare skin.
Do you have a condition?
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Cash
Apr 16, 2019 22:01:32 GMT
Post by distantcousin on Apr 16, 2019 22:01:32 GMT
I would not pay by card for anything less than £5 - utterly ridiculous.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 16, 2019 13:47:18 GMT
I would love to know the editorial reasons behind why they think enormous close ups of the leading actors (to the exclusion of anything else really) is a great representation of a show. The Dreamgirls one immediately springs to mind. I've got some great ones from the 90's that featured the actual sets... Unlike viserys I find brochures more essential than programmes (and brochures often feature cast info as well). More often than not reading people's credits can be like watching paint dry, and that sort of information is also generally available on the show's website.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 14, 2019 10:41:54 GMT
Brilliant to see this. Which reminds me of a pet peeve I have. So many of the brochures for the bigger West End shows these days feature hardly any photos of the sets. Just maHOOSIVE photos of the cast in close ups. (or dance ensembles)
I get the need for some of those, but surely a record/souvenir of what you were looking at all night in terms of set (or sets) is equally of value. Whoever designs them these days, or is giving the briefs to the designers seems to ignore them now. It's a shame.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 14, 2019 10:37:35 GMT
If it's any consolation, listened to the Cher Show cast album today - Adrienne sounds more like Tina than the lady on that does Cher. I beg to differ- I think Stephanie Block is great. But it’s the same problem of why listen to it when you can have the real thing!
Exactly. I think cast recordings of bio-musicals are pretty much redundant to begin with.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 12, 2019 18:51:13 GMT
And the issue of remembering lines at their ages.
Remember Landsbury had a prompt available via wireless earpiece, if needed.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 12, 2019 9:39:51 GMT
Haven’t heard of any of them. Probably because they all appear to be coming over from America to do this. Lloyd was clearly looking for ethnically appropriate cast members, so I wonder how much of the casting he did over there? Hopefully there will be some home-grown talent in the ensemble. I’m excited though!
Yes, seemed like ethnically focused casting was the priority above home-grown talent...
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 12, 2019 8:17:11 GMT
Always thought the film was a poor relation to Sunset Boulevard and undeserving of the Oscar in the same year although haven't seen it for years now. Thought the play exposed weaknesses in the story, it's pretty silly and inconsequential, and the tone is off, but maybe I'd think that if I rewatched the film. If Eve has such great star quality as we are told she doesn't need all the scheming beyond getting her foot in the door. As soon as she auditions and wins over New York's hottest playwright and leading critic to her talents, everything else is redundant. It's unclear if she is actually supposed to be obsessed with Margo or only pretends to be so to ingratiate herself. She's portrayed as Machiavellian but badmouthing Margo in the press is actually extremely stupid, as was telling Addison she is going to marry Lloyd before her opening night just when she wants him to write her a rave. For the story to work, I feel like it needs Eve to truly ruin Margo's life. Whereas Margo having to step away from young leading lady parts is inevitable with or without Eve. And Eve fails to seduce Bill which would have added some much needed dramatic punch. Or alternatively, if it's really a story about the brutality of aging for women, it would be better if Eve didn't scheme at all, she really was guileless, and Margo was obsessed with staying at the top but nothing she can do matters because she simply can't compete with a beautiful youth. Ironically given the title, I'm not sure we actually get to really know Eve and what makes her tick, we know what she wants but her underlying motivations are pretty opaque. Thought the decision to have a pivotal scene between Eve and Karen filmed off-stage was totally bizarre. That was balanced out with the camera in the mirror stuff which was very effectively done, probably the highlight. Hate the jarring men's costumes, I don't know why van Hove thinks it's clever to have one anachronistic element, it just takes me out of the play, did the same thing with the coffee in The Crucible on Broadway. Within the story there's some total nonsense like high schools across America having fan clubs for a stage actress in the movie era. Monica Dolan and Rhashan Stone did not make a believable couple, the acting in general was fine but little more. Would have been more interesting to see Cate Blanchett in the part, not necessarily better but to see how her more ethereal presence would have fitted in. Did think mentioning Sunset Boulevard that Gillian Anderson would be a better fit as Norma Desmond. Mind-boggling to think people will be paying £175 a ticket for such mediocre fare.
Agree 100% with this!!!!!! We thought the fan club thing was unrealistic. Dolan and the actor playing her hubby made an unconvincing couple, and the "no fixed time period" setting was frustrating.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 12, 2019 8:12:04 GMT
I thought it was interesting and entertaining, but it didn't make me "feel" that much. Glad I didn't pay for a ticket to see it in London.
Not sure if Lily James is really good enough to truly lift that role off the page.
I liked the video footage at times, but that and the exposed wing-space became fussy to me after a while.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 20:56:09 GMT
For me, it was all the buzz over the ALW mega-musicals in the 80's pervading the mainstream. I was always a pop charts kid, obsessed with the Radio 1 top 40 and Top of the Pops.
It was when the songs from Phantom started entering the charts and then all the press and buzz over it's opening that really made me curious and take notice of this new world/artform...
Being a TV addict and pop culture fiend, I'm sure the likes of Cats and Starlight Express then caught my attention when featured in TV light entertainment or Sat morning TV performances.
That was really it. Film musicals were not big in my house, and I've discovered over the years that unlike a lot of families, we didn't watch family films together so the likes of Mary Poppins, The Sound of Music have zero cultural capital with me.
So for me, when I think of what really made me first take notice of stage musicals, and more specifically "The West End", it just has to be "Phantom" - which is why it still holds a special and emotional place in my heart. (thought it would actually be another 5 years or so until I entered a West End theatre and watched a musical production....)
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 15:22:00 GMT
Interesting winner for Best Supporting ACTRESS according to Baz -
I'm saying nowt x
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 13:10:13 GMT
Oh, I saw Denis o'Hare at Follies 3 weeks ago. He was near me at the cloakroom collection!
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 13:08:56 GMT
Did I ever mention I was sat in the row in front of Antonio Banderas for "Company"?
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 12:55:41 GMT
I thought Rosalie totally over-egged that performance last night. I saw the show twice and neither time did she perform Being Alive like that. Presumably she was told to go ‘bigger’ for the RAH but that’s not necessarily right for tv. It all looked a bit cliched and, dare I say, desperate. Not just me then? Was completely different to what I saw at the Gielgud last December...
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 11:58:22 GMT
I feel like you've got a stereotypical idea of ITV's output that is ignoring everything that doesn't fit into your narrow idea of anti-intellectual/culturally destitute, whether on purpose to make an exaggerated point or accidentally because you're genuinely unaware, but ITV are just as likely to churn out a prestige drama as the BBC, and the BBC has its fair share of unscripted fluff and/or petty squabbling too. (Hell, maybe Jeremy Kyle should take over Newsnight for a bit...)
EXACTLY. Looking down one's nose at ITV, is an argument as stale as "my mummy wouldn't allow me to watch Tiswas!"
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 7:57:25 GMT
I think if the BBC wanted it, it'd be on BBC Four, I doubt BBC Two would want it either given how atrocious the ratings were for the ITV highlights in primetime, same with BBC One. Theatre will always be a niche pastime and will never attract a big audience and surprised ITV even do this, as live filming or quickly edited is very expensive. I have never been to any awards ceremony, or watch anything on television, internet or radio, don’t want to come across as snooty as I am certainly not, but the theatre I want to remember is just that in a theatre, not on some arena stage not designed for the production and a sound rig designed for multiple shows. Yes I check who won what out of curiosity and it might nudge me to see something again.
Interesting, isn't it. We hear reports of how many millions theatres are raking in in sales, and we probably move in circles and read certain media where theatre is very important and has vast cultural capital. But when contextualise with the UK population as a whole, one realises our interest really is soberingly "niche"
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 7:52:43 GMT
Wasn't it only 2 years ago ITV was showing the awards at prime time, not tucked away in this graveyard slot?... It did very badly in primetime so no surprise it got moved. It's lucky it's still on ITV at all!
Just shows that most of the TV viewing public are ingrates!
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 8, 2019 7:51:30 GMT
Just watched the Come From Away performance and it hasn't changed my mind about not wanting to see it. Looks very cheesy and hokey. YOU ARE SOOOOO MISTAKEN I'll take your word for it.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 7, 2019 21:53:42 GMT
Wasn't it only 2 years ago ITV was showing the awards at prime time, not tucked away in this graveyard slot?...
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 7, 2019 21:48:25 GMT
Just watched the Come From Away performance and it hasn't changed my mind about not wanting to see it.
Looks very cheesy and hokey.
|
|
1,871 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 7, 2019 21:41:48 GMT
I knew Sharon would sneak in and steal that award, Rosalie and Adrienne were robbed however Sharon was brilliant in the show so you can't be too mad at it.
For me Sharon's performance was on a whole other level to Rosalie.
|
|