3,938 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Apr 30, 2016 18:15:54 GMT
Isn't today's technology so far advanced that wires may no longer be necessary and they could use something really tiny hidden under a wig? Yep, this is how it works, they still have wires, but they are rather tiny and short and everything is kept under a wig What I wondered when I saw the show is where Samuel Holmes had his mic pack when he disrobed, as he wasn't wigged.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2016 23:19:00 GMT
Yep, this is how it works, they still have wires, but they are rather tiny and short and everything is kept under a wig What I wondered when I saw the show is where Samuel Holmes had his mic pack when he disrobed, as he wasn't wigged. My guess is they tape high onto his thigh so when he disrobes, you can't see it, even when he standing behind objects, it still would be hidden.
|
|
|
Post by theatregoer on May 1, 2016 19:31:15 GMT
What I wondered when I saw the show is where Samuel Holmes had his mic pack when he disrobed, as he wasn't wigged. My guess is they tape high onto his thigh so when he disrobes, you can't see it, even when he standing behind objects, it still would be hidden. Nope... it's in the Metronome that's on the piano and then he picks up for ... 'You should see me in Charcoal' All the girls' mics are in their wigs as previously commented. They are all completely nude, not a flesh coloured pant in the building...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 19:34:34 GMT
Ahhhh good for all of them going fully nude!
|
|
240 posts
|
Post by Anniek on May 3, 2016 14:48:08 GMT
Closing confirmed. Too bad it wasn't the best success. I really enjoyed it when I saw it last weekend.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2016 14:49:33 GMT
Closing confirmed. Too bad it wasn't the best success. I really enjoyed it when I saw it last weekend. Wasn't it confirmed about a month ago?
|
|
51 posts
|
Post by easilypleased on May 3, 2016 14:56:45 GMT
Odd. Maybe it was another marketing ploy, announcing a month ago they were going to close to get people to flock along. I don't think it worked. But now they're really really going to close!
|
|
240 posts
|
Post by Anniek on May 3, 2016 15:04:06 GMT
I thought that wasn't set in stone yet. If it was, sorry Daniel, wasn't fully up to date then.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2016 15:08:01 GMT
I thought that wasn't set in stone yet. If it was, sorry Daniel, wasn't fully up to date then. Don't be silly, no need to apologise I was just confused haha, I thought they had brought it forward or something! But yes, it has been set in stone as June 18th for about a month confirmed
|
|
571 posts
|
Post by westendwendy on May 3, 2016 16:55:38 GMT
I loved this show... What a shame this closes and Thriller is on for 5 years. Showbiz is crazy!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2016 18:41:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2016 19:08:25 GMT
I loved this show... What a shame this closes and Thriller is on for 5 years. Showbiz is crazy! I totally agree! I dont know how Thriller or Stomp has lasted this long
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on May 3, 2016 20:14:15 GMT
I totally agree! I dont know how Thriller or Stomp has lasted this long Well, it could be because both are popular and profitable.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on May 3, 2016 20:25:26 GMT
I totally agree! I dont know how Thriller or Stomp has lasted this long Well, it could be because both are popular and profitable. ...especially for tourists with little to no command of English.
|
|
240 posts
|
Post by Anniek on May 4, 2016 7:45:55 GMT
Well, it could be because both are popular and profitable. ...especially for tourists with little to no command of English. It's not like you need to have huge knowledge of English for Mrs H.. The human body is quite universal right?!
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on May 4, 2016 10:29:11 GMT
It's not like you need to have huge knowledge of English for Mrs H.. Judging from the comments on here, where so many of the audience don't get that the comedian is intended to be awful, you could be right
|
|
525 posts
|
Post by Hamilton Addict on May 5, 2016 11:15:36 GMT
Got day seats for the matinee yesterday and thought this show was great! Really sad it's closing, the show deserved better. The stand out for me was Ian Bartholomew, really thought he was phenomenal and I'm surprised that not that many people are discussing his performance. He's astounding in the song 'Living in a Dream World'. I feel that Olivier shouldv'e gone to Emma Williams. Lara Pulver is really good in Gypsy, but Emma's performance just seemed stronger. Tracie Bennett doesn't have the best vocals, however she is such a good actress it didn't really matter that much. Can understand why people don't like that comedian, but I thought Jamie Foreman did the best with the material he was given. Hopefully the show will have a good touring life!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2016 22:49:06 GMT
Another visit to this tonight. A small, but incredibly enthusiastic house.
Agree with Hamilton Addict, the show belonged to Ian Bartholomew tonight. I was thoroughly impressed. Tracie Bennett is a star, as is Emma Williams.
My main gripe with the show is it's score. It simply doesn't serve the show properly.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on May 6, 2016 6:54:51 GMT
Another visit to this tonight. A small, but incredibly enthusiastic house. Agree with Hamilton Addict, the show belonged to Ian Bartholomew tonight. I was thoroughly impressed. Tracie Bennett is a star, as is Emma Williams. My main gripe with the show is it's score. It simply doesn't serve the show properly.
I sort of disagree about the score. I think it does serve the show well in the theatre, but it doesn't impress on its own, as a listening experience, apart from the two best songs, What a Waste of a Moon and If Mountains Were Easy to Climb.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on May 6, 2016 8:33:12 GMT
Oddly, I found the reverse, mallardo. The songs didn't land in the theatre for me, but the CD has stood repeated playing. I'm afraid I found it fell apart as a show in the second half, where I thought there was nowhere useful for it to go and I stopped caring very much about any of them.
Hmm. Food for thought. I may have to see it again.
|
|
3,938 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on May 6, 2016 19:58:48 GMT
I really must get round to listening to the CD, which I bought just after seeing the show (more to support them rather than out of any great desire to hear the music again) but have yet to listen to. I was editing my recording of this year's Oliviers this evening & listening to Emma Williams' performance again made me think maybe I should try to see the show a second time before it closes. If only there was a bit less nudity - yes, I know nudity is the point but will going a second time look odd...
|
|
51 posts
|
Post by easilypleased on May 7, 2016 10:12:29 GMT
I really must get round to listening to the CD, which I bought just after seeing the show (more to support them rather than out of any great desire to hear the music again) but have yet to listen to. I was editing my recording of this year's Oliviers this evening & listening to Emma Williams' performance again made me think maybe I should try to see the show a second time before it closes. If only there was a bit less nudity - yes, I know nudity is the point but will going a second time look odd... Brace yourself and go. There's really not much nudity in it at all, timewise. Two maybe 4 minute female scenes in the first half and some fleeting male nudity (maybe 3 minutes), none at all in the second (fan dance doesn't count as nothing is revealed - ok, literally 2 seconds at the end). I think this is where the show's marketing shoots itself in the foot, they must have thought giving the impression of lots of nudity was a selling point but I'm sure many more people are put off by it than are attracted. Lots of songs about war and growing old though. Cheery stuff.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on May 7, 2016 11:47:34 GMT
"Put off" by beautiful nude women? On what planet?
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on May 7, 2016 11:53:23 GMT
"Put off" by beautiful nude women? On what planet?Venus?
|
|
51 posts
|
Post by easilypleased on May 7, 2016 12:40:30 GMT
"Put off" by beautiful nude women? On what planet? That's exactly my point. Having seen it I completely agree with you. But reviews posted by individuals regularly state they were relieved to find there isn't a lot of nudity and/or what there is is tasteful. So clearly some folks are apprehensive and some probably are put off completely. But whatever it is (and there are other factors I'm sure) something is keeping people away in their droves.
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on May 7, 2016 15:06:18 GMT
something is keeping people away in their droves. 1) It's a new British musical. 2) It's based on a very old-fashioned movie. 3) Its subject appealed to the dirty old mac brigade of many decades ago but now they are much better served by the internet.
|
|
3,824 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on May 7, 2016 15:12:19 GMT
something is keeping people away in their droves. 1) It's a new British musical. 2) It's based on a very old-fashioned movie. 3) Its subject appealed to the dirty old mac brigade of many decades ago but now they are much better served by the internet. Lol! The dirty old mack brigade. Love it! You know (honestly) I've never heard the term before but instantly I knew what you were talking about.
|
|
51 posts
|
Post by easilypleased on May 7, 2016 15:48:34 GMT
something is keeping people away in their droves. 1) It's a new British musical. 2) It's based on a very old-fashioned movie. 3) Its subject appealed to the dirty old mac brigade of many decades ago but now they are much better served by the internet. No I completely disagree, it's not for the dirty old mac brigade, it's a radical post modernist take on the female empowerment agenda and regaining control over body image. Or at least that's what I told my wife.
|
|
3,938 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on May 7, 2016 17:08:23 GMT
"Put off" by beautiful nude women? On what planet? I'm not very keen on nudity anywhere in public. I think the human body looks better clothed. And as a straight female seeing other women naked is a bit pointless. I admit that in this show we do get equal opportunities nudity as the men strip off too but I'd rather gaze at Matthew Malthouse & Samuel Holmes clothed.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on May 7, 2016 17:11:04 GMT
1) It's a new British musical. 2) It's based on a very old-fashioned movie. 3) Its subject appealed to the dirty old mac brigade of many decades ago but now they are much better served by the internet. No I completely disagree, it's not for the dirty old mac brigade, it's a radical post modernist take on the female empowerment agenda and regaining control over body image. Or at least that's what I told my wife.
Ha! Wish I'd thought of that.
|
|