|
Post by bobbievanhusen on Feb 28, 2023 9:13:06 GMT
I don't know what she's currently up to, but Emma Williams played Finch in the most recent all female workshop of this. Hopefully there will be a casting announcement soon.
|
|
2,348 posts
|
Post by zahidf on Mar 21, 2023 13:06:01 GMT
Tracie Bennet cast in this
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 21, 2023 15:12:36 GMT
Tracie Bennet cast in this as JB Biggley Much as I like TB as a performer, this only confirms to me that this production will be too far removed from the original for me. A real shame as the original has plenty to say about contemporary issues as well as those from the time it was written. This is just change for the sake of change.
|
|
4,462 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Mar 21, 2023 15:51:58 GMT
It's by the people who did Whistle, so this will be nothing like the actual musical
|
|
|
Post by c4ndyc4ne on Mar 21, 2023 16:07:11 GMT
Tracie Bennet cast in this as JB Biggley Much as I like TB as a performer, this only confirms to me that this production will be too far removed from the original for me. A real shame as the original has plenty to say about contemporary issues as well as those from the time it was written. This is just change for the sake of change. Change, for me, is always exciting. Seeing musicals in new light (Company, Guys and Dolls etc) always add something new and connect the issues then to the issues now. Plus it's all just a bit fun! Guess it's down to what you want your theatre going to achieve.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 21, 2023 16:14:35 GMT
as JB Biggley Much as I like TB as a performer, this only confirms to me that this production will be too far removed from the original for me. A real shame as the original has plenty to say about contemporary issues as well as those from the time it was written. This is just change for the sake of change. Change, for me, is always exciting. Seeing musicals in new light (Company, Guys and Dolls etc) always add something new and connect the issues then to the issues now. Plus it's all just a bit fun! Guess it's down to what you want your theatre going to achieve. On the whole I want to go to see the show that the writers created. Not what a director wants the show to be. Modern theatre has placed too much emphasis on the director and too little emphasis on the writer(s) In this particular case, I don't believe the director actually understands the original and certainly not what it is satirising. And that is troubling. It feels like exploiting an existing known piece to use it as a vehicle to tell a completely different story. And that is lazy. If you want a musical exploring how women bosses behave in modern business, go ahead and commission one. Don't impose an agenda on an existing show.
|
|
18,820 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Mar 21, 2023 16:15:04 GMT
Director Georgie Rankcom: “Our approach to this wonderful show is to trust the brilliant original and let the satire shine. To find the best possible company to tell this story, we expanded our ideas of who can play and embody these roles. When you’re looking for someone with the charisma and power to be the high powered boss with a flare for the occasional musical number, Tracie Bennett quickly becomes the top choice. I’m honoured and excited to be working with her on bringing this new version of How to Succeed to the stage.”
|
|
6,326 posts
|
Post by Jon on Mar 21, 2023 16:17:34 GMT
I think some people just don't want theatre to be refreshed and reinterpreted.
|
|
|
Post by sph on Mar 21, 2023 16:38:41 GMT
I think sometimes when a piece is reinterpreted in a very modern way, it can fall short of being as clever as it thinks it is.
The last revival of Company was a good example of that. An unmarried 35 year-old woman who's dating multiple men and has a busy life and career? It wasn't groundbreaking, Sex and the City was doing that exact story 20 years before.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 21, 2023 16:42:50 GMT
There is a difference between refreshing a show and just using it as a vehicle for the whims and caprices of a director.
What is key, for me, is respecting the essence of the original. This is something that brilliant reinterpretations do. And reinterpretations are at the top of my list of best shows I have seen over the past 30/50 years.
There is nothing about what has been announced about this version that gives any real indication that this necessary respect to the material is being given.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2023 17:14:12 GMT
I think sometimes when a piece is reinterpreted in a very modern way, it can fall short of being as clever as it thinks it is. The last revival of Company was a good example of that. An unmarried 35 year-old woman who's dating multiple men and has a busy life and career? It wasn't groundbreaking, Sex and the City was doing that exact story 20 years before.
Totally agree about Sex and the City covering similar ground, but it is much less common for it to be realized in a musical stage production, particularly one as iconic as Sondheim's Company. Changing Bobby to Bobbie did break ground in its own way.
|
|
2,348 posts
|
Post by zahidf on Mar 21, 2023 19:11:41 GMT
I think sometimes when a piece is reinterpreted in a very modern way, it can fall short of being as clever as it thinks it is. The last revival of Company was a good example of that. An unmarried 35 year-old woman who's dating multiple men and has a busy life and career? It wasn't groundbreaking, Sex and the City was doing that exact story 20 years before.
Totally agree about Sex and the City covering similar ground, but it is much less common for it to be realized in a musical stage production, particularly one as iconic as Sondheim's Company. Changing Bobby to Bobbie did break ground in its own way.
Also wasn't Sondheim all up for the company changes? Was a great production as well! I'll give this one a go. Its just a silly musical. Things should move with the times if it works.
|
|
1,189 posts
|
Post by theatrelover123 on Mar 21, 2023 19:14:07 GMT
There is a difference between refreshing a show and just using it as a vehicle for the whims and caprices of a director. What is key, for me, is respecting the essence of the original. This is something that brilliant reinterpretations do. And reinterpretations are at the top of my list of best shows I have seen over the past 30/50 years. There is nothing about what has been announced about this version that gives any real indication that this necessary respect to the material is being given. I'm pretty sure this production will respect 'the essence of the original' There isn't really enough info on it to make firm decisions on it either way yet so I think I will wait to see it/hear feedback before taking a line. But I sure am glad they are doing something fresh with it as I absolutely don't want to see another 'traditional' version of it. And I wouldn't expect Southwark to do that. And if this one doesn't 'work' then inevitably there will be another more faithful production of it coming down the line.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 21, 2023 20:05:28 GMT
Totally agree about Sex and the City covering similar ground, but it is much less common for it to be realized in a musical stage production, particularly one as iconic as Sondheim's Company. Changing Bobby to Bobbie did break ground in its own way.
Also wasn't Sondheim all up for the company changes? Was a great production as well! I'll give this one a go. Its just a silly musical. Things should move with the times if it works. There is nothing about moving with the times about regendering characters. It is, if anything, becoming very predictable. And I would take exception to the idea that this is a silly musical. It is actually a clever, witty look at a number of key subjects and all done with a light touch.
|
|
893 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Mar 21, 2023 23:01:36 GMT
There's a place for traditional staging of a musical but given how wedded theatre is to old work there must be the opportunity to do things differently as well.
Will this work, I don't know, but I also don't see the point of jumping to conclusions and writing it off already though I'm sadly not surprised.
|
|
1,189 posts
|
Post by theatrelover123 on Mar 21, 2023 23:09:48 GMT
Also wasn't Sondheim all up for the company changes? Was a great production as well! I'll give this one a go. Its just a silly musical. Things should move with the times if it works. There is nothing about moving with the times about regendering characters. It is, if anything, becoming very predictable. And I would take exception to the idea that this is a silly musical. It is actually a clever, witty look at a number of key subjects and all done with a light touch. I guess the positive about you not going is that it frees up a ticket for somebody to enjoy it and/or have an informed opinion about it when it opens. Silver linings all round.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 21, 2023 23:15:04 GMT
There is nothing about moving with the times about regendering characters. It is, if anything, becoming very predictable. And I would take exception to the idea that this is a silly musical. It is actually a clever, witty look at a number of key subjects and all done with a light touch. I guess the positive about you not going is that it frees up a ticket for somebody to enjoy it and/or have an informed opinion about it when it opens. Silver linings all round. We all have to make decisions about shows that have not opened based on the information provided by the producers and the venue. I stand by my interpretation of what has been announced here. It runs contrary to my view of a brilliant show. When people are making choices as to how to spend their limited disposable income, they are entitled to use whatever they like to reach their decisions. Making snide comments towards me is really not a helpful contribution to a discussion.
|
|
1,189 posts
|
Post by theatrelover123 on Mar 21, 2023 23:52:12 GMT
I guess the positive about you not going is that it frees up a ticket for somebody to enjoy it and/or have an informed opinion about it when it opens. Silver linings all round. We all have to make decisions about shows that have not opened based on the information provided by the producers and the venue. I stand by my interpretation of what has been announced here. It runs contrary to my view of a brilliant show. When people are making choices as to how to spend their limited disposable income, they are entitled to use whatever they like to reach their decisions. Making snide comments towards me is really not a helpful contribution to a discussion. Nothing snide about my comments. I stand by my interpretation of giving the show a chance based on wanting to hear more than the limited information provide by the producers and venue thus far. Perfectly valid - and not snide - contribution to the open, and mutually respectful conversation.
|
|
1,266 posts
|
Post by mkb on Mar 22, 2023 0:49:29 GMT
At just £12 per ticket with last year's subscription prices, I am more than happy to give this the benefit of the doubt until I've seen it.
|
|
213 posts
|
Post by frankubelik on Mar 22, 2023 3:51:48 GMT
Whilst not a fan of re-interpretation (or Ms Bennett's) I wonder how this production will deal with Biggley's relationship with Hedy La Rue...........I booked when announced but am somewhat regretful now.
|
|
|
Post by thistimetomorrow on Mar 22, 2023 8:21:47 GMT
Biggley's relationship with Hedy La Rue. young boy toy instead?
|
|
|
Post by bobbievanhusen on Mar 22, 2023 11:49:00 GMT
Tracie Bennet cast in this Thankfully JB Bigley only has 2 small numbers I've booked for this as i'm a big fan of the show, and previews are pretty cheap. How To Succeed rarely gets done as it is and having this interpretation only puts the chance of seeing the show as the writers intended, much further down the line.
|
|
18,820 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Mar 22, 2023 11:56:37 GMT
They’ll be much bigger numbers when La Bennett gets her chops round them!
|
|
2,348 posts
|
Post by zahidf on Apr 11, 2023 8:36:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bobbievanhusen on Apr 11, 2023 9:25:36 GMT
It will be interesting to see how they approach this, given that part of the story is asatire round the old values of Men home being the breadwinners and the women look after the home 'Happy To Keep His Dinner Warm'. Not sure how that will work as the 2 leads are both female. And they are all very young. I'm going to say too young. One of them is meant to have worked in the mailroom for 25 years! As someone who loves the show, it doesn't bode well.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2023 11:36:28 GMT
Keeping an open mind for the time being, but casting has me thinking I might opt to just cherish my warm memory of the Daniel Radcliffe-helmed Broadway revival and save a few quid for something else.
|
|
4,462 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Apr 11, 2023 11:50:29 GMT
Gabrielle Friedman was fabulous as Mary in Merrily We Roll Along at the Royal Academy last summer, so I'm actually fairly happy they're leading this.
I just...don't know how well this is going to go, but I probably will attend a few weeks in once they've got settled and see what it's like...
|
|
|
Post by ThereWillBeSun on Apr 11, 2023 22:52:46 GMT
I just can’t get over the prices after previews which I can’t make sadly. Seems an awful lot for fringe theatre. Not sure if I’m being horrible saying that.
|
|
|
Post by bobbievanhusen on Apr 12, 2023 1:34:45 GMT
I just can’t get over the prices after previews which I can’t make sadly. Seems an awful lot for fringe theatre. Not sure if I’m being horrible saying that. I feel that at least with the Southwark Playhouse you almost always get a decent production and usually with some great talent in it. Though of course, the price of something is all reletive to the individual.
|
|
3,475 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Apr 12, 2023 4:33:30 GMT
I just can’t get over the prices after previews which I can’t make sadly. Seems an awful lot for fringe theatre. Not sure if I’m being horrible saying that. How about buying the £75 PAYG ticket bundle? Only increased from £60 within the last few months but still great value and very flexible as they never expire. Lost count of how many I've bought.
|
|